I have this constant fear I got onto [Batman] too early. As a comic book writer, I’m a baby. I’m maybe five years old? Literally. Grant took on the character when he was Grant Morrison. He had done amazing things with All-Star Superman, New X-Men, right and left. Frank [Miller] had done amazing things with Daredevil. … I was talking about this with Neil Gaiman at a Vertigo gathering, and it’s pretty funny. We were at dinner and then he asked me how I was doing with Batman. I told him about “Super Heavy” and that I was nervous. He stopped me and said, “Scott, you’re worried that you’re not good enough,” which I replied that I was. “Soon,” he said, “you’ll be worried because you used to be better.”
It’s just a hill – up the bad side, down the bad side.
Study Finds Quitting Facebook Makes You Happier and Less Stressed →
Vindication.
I love this woman.
Mark Zuckerberg Will Donate Massive Fortune to Own Blinkered Worldview →
Sam Biddle writing for Gawker:
We should be suspicious of $45 billion earmarked to build out this worldview, and we should remember that much of that $45 billion will benefit Zuckerberg’s peers, materially and otherwise. And perhaps we should also wonder whether instead of letting the mega-rich put their estates into “charities” of their own design, and thanking them profusely for it, we wouldn’t be better served by just taking it from their corpses.
The business community in Wisconsin should ask policy-makers to calm the seas around higher education funding, or risk sinking a research ship that helps keep the economy above water.
– Tom Still, president of the Wisconsin Technology Council
Douglass North has passed away at age 95 →
One of the all time greats.
Margaret Levi and Barry Weingast remember North at The Monkey Cage.
Trust and Policy Preferences →
John Sides on the Pew Research Center report Beyond Distrust: How Americans View Their Government:
There are clear partisan divides on some issues, such as ensuring access to health care. But on other issues there is a substantial bipartisan consensus.
If there is one good generalization about Americans’ attitudes toward government, it is this: Americans hate government, but they like what it does.
“Keep your government hands off my Medicare,” etc., etc.
The Presidency Is Not an Award We Give for Achievement in Another Field →
Seth Masket writing in the aftermath of Larry Lessig’s presidential campaign:
Parties recognize that the presidency is an actual job requiring not just intelligence, wisdom, or determination, but political skill. Knowing which agenda items to push for and which to abandon when times get tough; knowing whom to appoint to what positions and whom to avoid; knowing how to work with Congress when possible and fight them when necessary; knowing the tone to take during a war, crisis, or natural disaster; knowing how to work with people you can’t stand and occasionally break with longtime allies; knowing when advisers are being honest with you and when they’re pushing crap — these are actual skills, and they are vital to the job of the presidency. Some people may have more aptitude for them than others, but they all take time and effort to hone, and there’s absolutely no reason to think that a well-published law professor, a wealthy real estate mogul, or a talented surgeon has more of these skills than anyone else does.
We don’t deserve John Roderick.
Zen & The Art of iTunes Failure →
Jeffery Zeldman learns to cope with an iTunes data loss:
This loss is nothing. Attachment is futile. Always move forward, until you stop moving.
Ack. This would hurt me.
You Say You Want a Revolution (on The Critical Path) →
Horace Dediu, who has been extremely kind to me over the past few years by inviting me to his Asymconf and Airshow workshops, indulged me even further by having me appear as a guest on his podcast The Critical Path.
I have a few of extensions to make (and also clarifications), which I hope to blog soon, but here is the synopsis for the episode:
Horace discusses politics and disruption with Michael Tofias. Is disruption of government possible? Michael pursues the study of American political institutions, elections, Congress, and computational political economy to reveal how disruption might play out within governments.
It’s a pretty wide-ranging discussion, but a pretty fun one too. I hope that you’ll take a listen. Perhaps I show a bit of rustiness when talking political science and political economy having spent too much of the past couple years considering python and not politics, but overall I’d give myself a B- (which is hopefully good enough, so to speak).